首页> 外文OA文献 >The Care Plus study- a whole system intervention to improve quality of life of primary care patients with multimorbidity in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial and cost-utility analysis
【2h】

The Care Plus study- a whole system intervention to improve quality of life of primary care patients with multimorbidity in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial and cost-utility analysis

机译:Care plus研究 - 一项全面的系统干预措施,旨在改善社会经济贫困地区多发病的初级保健患者的生活质量:探索性群集随机对照试验和成本效用分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

METHODS\udWe used a phase 2 exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial with eight general practices in Glasgow in very deprived areas that involved multimorbid patients aged 30–65 years. The intervention comprised structured longer consultations, relationship continuity, practitioner support, and self-management support. Control practices continued treatment as usual. Primary outcomes were quality of life (EQ-5D-5L utility scores) and well-being (W-BQ12; 3 domains). Cost-effectiveness from a health service perspective, engagement, and retention were assessed. Recruitment and baseline measurements occurred prior to randomisation. Blinding post-randomisation was not possible but outcome measurement and analysis were masked. Analyses were by intention to treat.\ud\udRESULTS\udOf 76 eligible practices contacted, 12 accepted, and eight were selected, randomised and participated for the duration of the trial. Of 225 eligible patients, 152 (68 %) participated and 67/76 (88 %) in each arm completed the 12-month assessment. Two patients died in the control group. CARE Plus significantly improved one domain of well-being (negative well-being), with an effect size of 0.33 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.11–0.55) at 12 months (p = 0.0036). Positive well-being, energy, and general well-being (the combined score of the three components) were not significantly influenced by the intervention at 12 months. EQ-5D-5L area under the curve over the 12 months was higher in the CARE Plus group (p = 0.002). The incremental cost in the CARE Plus group was £929 (95 % CI: £86–£1788) per participant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years of 0.076 (95 % CI: 0.028–0.124) over the 12 months of the trial, resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of £12,224 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Modelling suggested that cost-effectiveness would continue.\ud\udCONCLUSIONS\udIt is feasible to conduct a high-quality cluster randomised control trial of a complex intervention with multimorbid patients in primary care in areas of very high deprivation. Enhancing primary care through a whole-system approach may be a cost-effective way to protect quality of life for multimorbid patients in deprived areas.
机译:方法\ ud我们在格拉斯哥的极度贫困地区使用了2种探索性整群随机对照试验,其中有8种常规做法,涉及30-65岁的多病患者。干预包括结构化的较长时间的咨询,关系的连续性,从业人员的支持和自我管理的支持。控制措施照常继续治疗。主要结果是生活质量(EQ-5D-5L实用评分)和幸福感(W-BQ12; 3个领域)。从卫生服务的角度,参与和保留的成本效益进行了评估。招募和基线测量发生在随机分组之前。随机化后无法进行盲处理,但结果测量和分析被掩盖了。分析是按意向进行的。\ ud \ udRESULTS \ ud在研究期间接触了76种合格实践,选择了12种,选择了8种,随机分配并参加了试验。在225名合格患者中,有152名(68%)参与其中,每组中有67/76名(88%)完成了12个月的评估。对照组中有两名患者死亡。 CARE Plus显着改善了一个幸福域(负幸福感),在12个月时的影响大小为0.33(95%置信区间[CI] 0.11-0.55)(p = 0.0036)。在12个月时的干预对正向幸福感,能量和总体幸福感(这三个组成部分的总分)没有显着影响。 CARE Plus组在12个月内曲线下的EQ-5D-5L面积更高(p = 0.002)。 CARE Plus组的增量成本为每位参与者929英镑(95%CI:86–1788英镑),在12个月的质量调整生命年中获得了0.076(95%CI:0.028-0.124)。最终,每质量调整生命年的成本效益比为12,224英镑。模型表明,成本效益将持续下去。\ ud \ ud结论\ ud对于高度贫困地区的初级保健中的多病态患者,进行复杂干预的高质量整群随机对照试验是可行的。通过全系统方法加强初级保健可能是保护贫困地区多病患者生活质量的一种经济有效的方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号